tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24675558001698997632011-11-27T19:31:23.062-05:00The easy-to-understand truth about 9/11 from a physics perspective.Daniel LaLibertehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01855884898451299505noreply@blogger.comBlogger41100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467555800169899763.post-21144435955383744902010-05-11T21:17:00.000-04:002010-05-11T21:17:55.358-04:00

Now for the third puzzle in this three-part series introduced by The Plane of the Shadow Wedge. Here we will get a better perspective on the shadow wedge with the help of the two "puffballs". This puzzle is called "The Over-Under Puffball" and is shown below. The puzzle is fairly obvious: how is it that the left puffball in the Fairbanks video appears to be behind or above the wing? Could

Daniel LaLibertehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01855884898451299505noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467555800169899763.post-90212796203236728002010-05-11T20:58:00.000-04:002010-05-11T20:58:06.494-04:00

This is the second of the puzzles addressed in a three-part series introduced by The Plane of the Shadow Wedge.   The first part was No Obvious Mask, in which we identify the shadow mask on the South side of the WTC2 tower at the time UA175 impacts the building. So then I wondered if this same shadow wedge would explain what we see in other videos, other perspectives of the same plane-tower

Daniel LaLibertehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01855884898451299505noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467555800169899763.post-86171628802794615882010-05-11T20:38:00.000-04:002010-05-11T20:38:47.156-04:00

This is the first of the puzzles addressed in a three-part series introduced by The Plane of the Shadow Wedge. The solution to these puzzles first occurred to me as I was pondering the "One Obvious Mask", shown on the left. (This is also known as the Spiegel video.) There is, I must admit, a very obvious straight line division where the plane appears to disappear into the building. Is this

Daniel LaLibertehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01855884898451299505noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467555800169899763.post-59476494129888664742009-03-01T20:55:00.087-05:002010-05-11T22:54:01.576-04:00

I must clarify at the outset that, while I believe 9/11 was an inside job, it is not because of any video fakery evidence I have seen. In fact, I don't consider the video fakery theories or the no-plane theories (which require video fakery) very credible at all. But Ace Baker has done a fine job of presenting some interesting challenges, or worthy puzzles, as I like to think of them, on his 9/11

Daniel LaLibertehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01855884898451299505noreply@blogger.com1